Rising property taxes is a hot issue in the race for Governor, yet the essential fix being offered by Gov. Greg Abbott and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick is a decrease in the duty rollback rate. (The rollback tax rate provides the taxing unit with about the same amount of tax revenue it spent the previous year for day-to-day operations, plus an extra eight percent increase for operations and sufficient funds to pay debts in the coming year.)  Since administrative expenses will top local taxes, this would indicate that high property taxes are caused by local administrative reckless spending. On the off-chance that this was valid, it would release the state from obligation and duty to change and would make remedies on a state level pointless.


Expenses and government-funded school financing rules are unpredictable and, like the proverbial dishonestly shuffled deck of cards, stacked with information not generally known by Texas citizens. This permits state officials to dodge hard inquiries regarding these issues at election time and keep running for office by speaking to the voters’ outrage. Mortgage holders are furious about the agony of high property taxes; they simply don’t generally know who’s at fault. They do know that tax reform is needed in Texas.


Promising to settle property assessment issues with local administrative-imposed top-down spending cuts is misleading and is simply one more unfunded state directive.  School taxes make up 54 percent of all local taxes; however an expense cut would not make a difference to state-funded instruction.

As of late, the state’s offer of government-funded spending has declined from 45 to 37 percent, according to the Legislative Budget Board. Neighborhood property assessment dollars have increased to cover that tax reduction. The Texas Education Agency predicts it will “recover” $5.13 billion amid the following spending time frame, up from $3.69 billion in the present spending plan.

Increasing income from school taxes enables the state to utilize neighborhood property taxes for programs other than education. It has turned into a device to help adjust the state spending plan.

Recovery, or what is regularly called “the Robin Hood plan,” has been ruled legitimate by Texas courts. The Robin Hood plan is the state’s practice of collecting portions of property tax revenue from wealthier districts and redistributing it to poorer ones, also known as “recapture.” The state Constitution denies a state property assessment; however when neighborhood property taxes are utilized for purposes other than education, it could be described as an imposed state property tax?

Property taxes provide more cash to local administrations in Texas than any other source. Property taxes help to pay for government-funded schools, city streets, area streets, police, fire assurance and numerous administrations. When you tie the local administrative hands with unfunded state mandates, it does nothing to cure the genuine issue of school subsidizing. Additionally, there is a good possibility expenses for different administrations will rise. Schools, urban communities, junior colleges and metropolitan utility areas, or MUDs, are seeing significant income decrease from an escape clause that is moving assessment obligations to citizens.


Supposed value assessments disregard real market value (buyer and sellers confidence). The value escape clause enables an organization to lower an incentive by contrasting their property with another that might be many miles away. The issue is that the law does not characterize what it considers an equivalent property. When one owner gets his assessment reduced, another owner can use that one as a comparison, regularly bringing about qualities that have very little to do with their actual value— a radical takeoff from the acknowledged examination.

In 20 years, taxes in Texas have embraced such a framework. No other state has adopted such a system “No one else has been so dumb,” said Jim Robinson, previous head appraiser for the Harris County Appraisal District. The consequence of the value law is a move in tax obligation from a large number of enormous corporations to ordinary homeowners and private ventures. This escape clause harms urban communities and does extraordinary damage to the lower and middle classes.

Since its inception, the quantity of claims has snowballed. Local districts are compelled to settle since it resembles battling in a ring without any ropes.

In Jefferson County, local schools and governments had to pay Valero Energy $24 million to settle a property value claim challenging the assessment of its refinery in Port Arthur.

In Texas City, Valero Energy Corp is utilizing this legitimate provision that is constraining the city, local schools, the College of the Mainland, and the region to pay about $15 million in property taxes. Texas City Mayor Matthew Doyle said, “They’re taking $9 million from the students of Texas City and La Marque.” Also, TCISD has sent over $100 million to the state recovery or the alleged Robin Hood scheme.

Other industry wouldn’t sit on the sidelines for long if their opposition was getting decreases, and that is precisely what is occurring. A year ago the CAD was compelled to bring down the estimation of the Marathon Galveston Bay Refinery (GBR) to $705 million from the $1.8 billion valuation when BP owed a similar refinery in 2009, as indicated by Galveston County Appraisal District records. The reduction disregarded the fact that the GBR is presently the second-largest refinery in the district, having acquired the $240 million smaller Marathon refinery, and is part of the way through a $2 billion-dollar extension.

The general population of Texas City appreciates their refineries; however those organizations need to pay their fair share. Mortgage holders are extended as far as possible and beyond any doubt stretched thin with more expense duty imposed on them.

State officials need to choose whether tax reform and diminishing mortgage holders and independent companies of some of this high expense torment is more essential than respecting powerful enormous organizations and other uncommon interests.