Checking all available options...

Property Tax Inquiries Call 713.290.9700

Cost Segregation Without an On-Site Analyst

The primary reason to remove an on-site inspection is to reduce the fee associated with having an analyst come to your property. While these savings can be substantial, there are many risks as well. The biggest danger is overstating the amount of depreciation, as this can bring down the wrath of the IRS. Undervaluation may not bring legal problems, but it will undercut your cost segregation to an extent, possibly erasing any savings that avoiding the on-site visit would bring. To counter this, O’Connor’s approach to DIY cost segregation aims to give you both reduced costs and accurate results on your study. In some scenarios, we will provide a site visit for free if we believe it will achieve a credible result.

When we are assisting your DIY cost segregation effort, it is imperative that our appraiser is given plenty of hard evidence, like documents, video, and tax roll data. Evidence always trumps a mathematical model, something often deployed by other firms. This is because of the many weaknesses found in mathematical models:

The IRS does not view such models as a credible method.

The model does not create a credible result.

Mathematical models do not produce the documents required by the IRS.

We at O’Connor will use statistical modeling for certain aspects, but these are always carefully chosen cases. Usually, it is for a client that has many properties with a similar layout. For instance, if a client has a dozen fast-food restaurants with the same layout, there is no need to visit all of them. This is the only situation in which we will use modeling, as any other factor is inadequate to the requirements of the IRS.

O’Connor’s Collaborative Method

When it comes to DIY, O’Connor is an active partner in your cost segregation journey. We will work tirelessly with you to generate accurate reports. We will primarily focus on a few factors in this team-based study:

Your team does the work of getting us documents, videos, photos, and other hard evidence.

We will interview and discuss details with employees and management at a building to find out about any issues that they may know.

Your team also provides basic information to us, such as when the building was constructed, the year it was built, and when it was acquired.

What Not to Do

As stated above, some property tax experts cut corners via mathematical models. While this may seem simple, it leaves a lot of information out. This creates gaps in which mistakes can be made and depreciation can be lost. Such models only take in the most basic information, such as the age and size of a building. There can be 100 or more short-life depreciation components in most commercial properties.

Some mathematical model weaknesses are:

Depreciation is often underreported, leaving money on the table.

The opposite situation occurs, and depreciation is extensively overestimated.

The IRS will not care about depreciation being underreported, as it will help keep your tax bill high. However, overstating depreciation can cause some serious problems.

This is why we at O’Connor take care when reviewing your cost segregation reports:

We verify that only credible methods were used.

Determine that all results are as accurate as possible.

Ensure that everything is documented, especially your results.

The O’Connor Guarantee:

If we are contacted by the IRS in regards to your cost segregation report, we will stand by it and defend it to the last. We have never failed to explain or justify our reports to the IRS.

We will refund our fee if you do not save on your income taxes as a result of our report.